Látom közben gondolom ezzel a résszel van bajotok: "recipient shall use Confidential Information solely for the benefit of Nvidia and shall not.". Szerintem akik először írták a Heise weblapon félreértették , és van újságírók között is aki velem ért egyet (az alábbi cikkben az író el is mondja miért): "http://www.game-debate.com/news/25335/nvidia-nda-causes-controversy-as-press-claim-it-gags-journalists-forces-positive-reviews" Idézem őket és a magyarázatukat: "In Section 3 we do get an interesting statement though, which has spun off into several news articles citing that Nvidia is forcing the press to only publish positive reviews. Under Section 3: Use Restriction, Nvidia writes that the ?Recipient shall use Confidential Information solely for the benefit of Nvidia and shall not...?, before proceeding to outline several steps that can?t be taken by the press if the NDA is agreed to. This includes posting Confidential Information from press events, sharing the Confidential Information in news stories or on forums, predicting future announcements using the Confidential Information as a basis for this, threatening to expose the information in exchange for cash, or providing login information that could allow others to gain access. Basically, this information is private until the agreed date and any move to break the NDA could result in legal action. As with much of what?s been said before, this is absolutely normal behaviour. The part that seems to have stuck though is the ?Recipient shall use Confidential Information solely for the benefit of Nvidia.? Unfortunately, this is a rather nebulous statement and thus causing the confusion. It could be read as an agreement that the recipient can only write positive things that benefit Nvidia, but bearing in mind of the rest of the third clause, it appears this is purely in regardings to the leaking of potentially sensitive Confidential Information rather than a restriction imposed on any qualitative assessments from journalists. To go back to the earlier example, the end result is that a hardware reviewer would be absolutely restricted from posting about the GTX 1180 they were reviewing until the embargo is up, as this would be ?for the benefit of Nvidia?. Once the embargo is up though, they would then be free to make a judgment on the quality of the product. To that end, information that is in the public domain is not subject to any NDA restrictions from Nvidia." Controllerként egyébként vállalatok Pénzügy, számvitel, marketing és információs rendszereit koordinálom és a vállalati tervezést és én is heti szinten írok alá NDA-kat, hisz ezen rendszerek megismerésével tonnaszám jutok bizalmas adatokhoz. Az én hozzászólásom is erősre sikerült elsőnek (a kezdet ,hogy olvastatok már NDA-t stb, hisz ti is csak átvettétek a cikket például) azért bocsánatot kérek.